Gold Update Seabridge Gold SA, Kinross Gold KGC, World Gold Production Up & Oil; 2012 Will Be A Volatile Year For Stocks Hecla Mining HL, Airline Stocks

     If the first two months are any indication, 2012 will be a very busy year for investors. Just when you think you're ahead of the game some external, unaccounted-for factor changes everything. It can be reassuring though, knowing that everyone has to adjust their portfolios accordingly. Take for example the airline industry;

Over the last month (Feb - Mar) the price of WTI oil shot up 11% from just under $99/bbl to $109/bbl. Consequently, brent crude hit a 43-month high of $128.40/bbl on March 1, 2012.  How did that affect airline stocks? They were BATTERED more than the fish at Red Lobster! Over the last month United Continental Holdings Inc (nyse:UAL) was -16%, Delta Air Lines (DAL) -14%, Lufthansa (DLAKY) -7%, negatives across the board all because of the price of oil. What's more, oil could soar even higher if Iran chooses to close the Strait of Hormuz because the Strait is used to transport 7% of the world's oil; Closure of the Strait of Hormuz is entirely possible now given that Europe has implemented an embargo on Iranian oil (supplied 4% of Europe's demand last year) and that it's already dealing with the toughest sanctions the West can impose on it (Iran is now demanding payment for its oil in gold). sidenote: India is one of a few countries that still imports oil from Iran.

Canadian bank stocks proving their value once again !  The two largest by size, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) and Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) raised dividends despite profits being lower.  At RBC the dividend increase was 5.6% bringing it up to 0.57/share in the latest quarter (eps was down 4.7% to $1.21/share).  At TD, the 1Q2012 showed mixed results.  Though TD earnings dropped marginally (-0.01/share to $1.55) revenue grew 3.3% to $5.64B.  Though profits did not grow the bank continued to hand out larger dividends (+4c quarterly to 0.72).

Also making news is SNC-Lavalin.  Partnered with Aecon, SNC won a $600M contract to refurbish Ontario, Canada's Darlington nuclear station.  That pushed the stock up 2.2% in just the last day helping it to climb over the $6B level of capitalization.  Prior to the news, the stock was reeling (lost $1.6B about 1/5th of its market cap in just the last couple days) because of reports of undocumented payments unrelated to company projects eroding away at 2011 profits.

The World is Producing More Gold but also Consuming More (led by China, Germany and Thailand)
     In 2011, 11 of the world's 14 leading gold producing regions raised their output according to the US Geological Survey's 2012 Mineral Commodity Summaries, which isn't surprising considering the 28% jump in gold price (and cash costs, accordingly).  On the year, world primary production was up 5.5% to 2700 tons (86.4M ounces).  The world's 14 major producers accounted for 76.7% of output down from 78.2% in 2010.  Although production in China was higher, the growth was not as great as it had been over the last couple years (+2.9% compared to +22.0% for #8 Ghana, +20.9% for #7 Canada and +16.4% for #11 Mexico).  South Africa is home to 11.8% of the world's gold reserves (2nd overall behind Australia) but was the source of only 7% of production in 2011 bringing its overall rank down to 5 from 1 in 2007.  Why the drop for South Africa?  Because of ridiculously high production costs; South Africa has the unfavorable distinction of being the most expensive country to produce in (among major producing regions).
When investing in gold mining companies be sure to have companies with projects in Australia high on you list (ie BHP Billiton - Olympic Dam).  Australia was the source of only 10% of global production last year but is home to 15% of reserves meaning growth will happen.  Production costs (South Africa) and barriers to entry (China) are also not as problematic in Australia.  In late 2011 China began drafting new standards for the gold industry which could have a significant effect on both investment and production in the country.

Most of China's gold output comes from small companies but the new standards will eliminate some of them while at the same time, making it more difficult for new companies to enter the industry.
With regards to the United States, the gold supply and demand situation there is not as dire as one would expect.  In 2011 GOLD CONSUMPTION ACTUALLY FELL -17% to 194.9 tonnes (2nd consecutive year that US gold demand dropped).  That's in stark contrast to China (+22% to 811.2 tonnes) and Germany (+26% to 159.3 tonnes). Global consumption of gold in 2011 was 4067.1 tonnes, highest since 1997. Interestingly in Thailand (#7 consumer) where total consumption grew +57% to 108.9 tonnes, jewelry only accounted for 3.8% of the total (fell 34% on the year) but bar and coin demand +66% to 104.8 tonnes. The top six consumers remained the same,

Investing in gold: Mining Companies
Did you know? Mining companies are actually LOSING CAPITAL TO ETF'S !  According to Bank of Montreal analyst Peter Miller ETF's are a "hoover of capital and competition for the gold companies".  To regain investor confidence (and capital) many producers are hiking up dividends.  I think that mining stocks present a unique opportunity for investors at the moment.  Yamana is raising quarterly dividends by 10%.

With regards to gold producers, 2011 wasn't as profitable as one would expect.  At Newmont Mining and Goldcorp, 2 of the 4 largest by market cap, net earnings were lower despite record breaking revenue.  Part of the reason has to do with rising cash costs; +12.5% to $460 at Barrick Gold, +20.5% to $591/oz at Goldcorp (though lower from $270 to $223 when by products are taken into account), +40% at Australia's Newcrest, since 2009 +29.7% at Yamana Gold.  Higher mining costs are atributable to increasing equipment, labor and raw material costs. Higher gold and silver prices buffered the effects of higher costs however companies need to do more to translate sales growth into earnings growth. The higher gold price allowed even AngloGold Ashanti to add to reserves; Anglogold's reserves went up 4.4M ounces bringing the total to 75.6M ounces; 3.7M of the 4.4M oz added came due to higher prices making extraction from ore at Vaal River economically viable (3.2M oz) and 0.5M oz attributable to improved ore reserve price at Geita.

South America increasingly important to major gold miners - Gold Fields will get 20% of its 2015 gold production from that region, up from 10% in 2011, 2% in 2008.  In 2011 Gold Fields produced 3.697m ounces of gold which is 4.0% less than in 2010 (3.851m ounces) but it did receive 28.6% more for each ounce of gold ($1569 vs $1220).  Barrick Gold's huge project Pascua Lama is in Argentina.  Goldcorp's largest venture is the Penasquito mine in Mexico.

Undervalued Mining Companies

Seabridge Gold (tsx: SEA) - In February released its 2012 Operations Overview and the new data is impressive to say the least (maybe that's why the stock is UP +8% since February 13, still down though over 20% last 6 months because of increased volatility in metal prices (even Barrick Gold is down 10% over six months).  Its flagship project, KSM has 2P reserves of 38.5M ounces for gold, 9.985B pounds for copper, 214M ounces of silver and 257M pounds of molybdenum;  That means it has more gold than world renown projects Pueblo Viego, Penasquito and possibly even Ivanhoe Mine's mega project Oyu Tolgoi (46.4M ounces of gold) if KSM reserves are increased in April which is likely given the successful M&I drilling results reported by the company on February 8, 2012.  Reserves in situ value is about 15% greater than Goldcorp's Penasquito and Seabridge's enterprise value per ounce of reserves is only $21 ! which is ridiculously low considering it's $1200 at Canada's other major gold junior-mid cap company AuRico.  At Detour Gold and Osisko Mining enterprise value/oz is around $400.  Don't forget that KSM isn't the only major Seabridge project, there's also Courageous Lake (8M oz M&I 16 year mine life). Because reserve grade is relatively low the company will benefit from rising metal prices moreso than say Yamana Gold.

The same month, on February 8, 2012 measured and indicated resources at KSM improved by 3.7 million ounces for gold (to 49.0 million ounces) meaning that drill results continue to be successful.  What it also means is that the company's next report on proven and probable reserves (April 2012) will likely indicate further increases in 2P reserves, past the current estimate.  In the February report, Seabridge Gold estimates annual production at KSM will be 854,000 ounces (gold), 166 million pounds (copper), 2.9 million ounces (silver), 1.1 million pounds (molybdenum) for the first seven years (the mine has a 52 year mine life, molybdenum production will actually grow after the first seven years).  Base cash cost will be $231/oz which is even lower than Goldcorp ($300).

This company screams undervalued.  How does a company with 40M ounces of 2P gold reserves (more than Yamana Gold, Agnico-Eagle Mines) at just one of its projects have a market cap under $1 billion ?  Royal Gold has shown confidence in the company's numbers (invested $100m in Seabridge last year).  The construction costs remain quite high but I think that $2000 gold (when it happens) will open up more financing options (like Eldorado Gold recently got from Qatar Holdings).  Consider this:  2 years ago when gold prices were a lot lower, Barrick Gold paid Kinross Gold $475m ($455m cash) for 25% interest in the Cerro Casale gold copper project which has only 60% as much gold as KSM.  That would value KSM at over 3X Seabridge Gold's market cap at present.

Hecla Mining Company (nyse: HL) - On January 11, 2012 Hecla announced that the Lucky Friday Mine in Idaho which produced 31.5% of the company's 9,498,337 ounces of silver in 2011, will be shut down for the entire 2012 year.  The day of the announcement the stock fell 18.7% from $5.67 --> $4.61.  All this because of a December 2011 accident at Lucky Friday in which a number of employees were injured when the mine collapsed (including a couple fatalities).  You can be sure that whatever structural problems caused the collapse will be dealt with quickly (only two months was needed to fix the problem, the 12 month closure is due to new inspections and safety procedures required by federal regulators;  A group of shareholders even tried to sue the government over the closure).  Hecla wasn't the only miner that suffered fatalaties last quarter, 6 people died in accidents at three AngloGold Ashanti mines.

Though Lucky Friday is the source of only 31% of silver output (0% for gold) and 30% of 2P silver reserves, it's Hecla's only source of proven silver reserves (~21 million ounces);  In 2011 it was the source of all of Hecla's total increase in 2P silver reserves (+7 million ounces), so it remains a significant growth project for the company.  Lucky Friday also makes the company more diversified, being home to three-quarters of its 1.5 million ton lead resource.  The other operating mine, Green's Creek was purchased from Rio Tinto in 2008.

There are many reasons to like Hecla Mining

* The price of silver jumped 74.2% in 2011, single handedly causing Helca's profit to grow 286% to $150.6M.  Revenue reached a record high of $477M even though it sold 13.3% less silver; in fact sales of all four metal types were down (-17.5% for gold, -16.6% for lead, -12.4% for zinc).  The company's stock value is down -50% from a year ago even though revenue and profit is up significantly;  Even considering the 30% drop in silver production, next year company profits probably won't be less than they were in 2010 with high commodity prices a mainstay.
* The company has no debt and nearly $290M in cash and cash equivalents.
* Lucky Friday structural damage only needs two months to fix.
* Hecla Mining has three other significant projects at San Sebastien, San Juan and Noonday.  Company's valuation at present definitely isn't giving any of those projects respect.

Thompson Creek Metals (tsx: TCM) - The stock has been in selloff mode for the better part of a week after the company reported that the Mt. Milligan project will cost more than previously thought.  That prompted TD Bank to downgrade it.

Barrick Gold - Pueblo Viejo (60%) and Pascua Lama mines will begin producing in 2012/2013.  When fully operational (2016) the mines will add 1.5 million ounces of annual output to Barrick Gold's current production of 7.68 million ounces.  Pueblo Viejo is 90% complete.  Barrick profited 25% more in 2011 than it did last year ($4.48 billion, $$4.67 billion adjusted).  In February Barrick exited Russia when it sold off its last remaining asset there (25% interest in Highland Gold).

Goldcorp - 2011 production was 2.5147 million ounces.  By 2016 production will rise to 4.2 million ounces.  Revenue grew by 43% in 2011 more than any other top 10 gold miner.  El Morro in Chile ($3.9b project) is one of the reasons for the higher output projection.

Newcrest Mining - 515,000 oz of gold in 2011 came from the Telfer mine representing about 20% of company total (Telfer is home to 14.9% of its 79.1M oz of reserves, 7.7% of the 8.36M tonnes of copper reserves).  Total company production in the 2Q2012 FY (ending December 2011) was 579,023 oz down 19.9% qoq, the quarter before that 1Q2012 output was down 16% to 587,296 oz.  Over the last two quarters production from Telfer was down 50,000 oz.  2011 calendar year production increase comes entirely from the Lihir Gold acquisition.

Kinross Gold - Yes it was hit with a $2.94 billion impairment charge stemming from an unexpected writedown on its Tasiast mine in Mauritania absorbed during the fourth quarter of 2011.  That effectively more than wiped out any profit the company was on track to make in 2011 (ended up losing just over $2B on the year).  But keep in mind the company's revenue (+31%), gold production (+13.0% to 2.6M oz), and cost of sales (+28% even though production up more than 30%, production cost of sales up 17.7% to $596/oz which is comparable to its peers in the industry).  Another telling statistic: cash margins up 32% to $906/oz ($965 in 4Q +23%), margins were also up 32% at America's largest gold miner Newmont Mining (Newmont's stock is up 16% last 12 months, Kinross is down -32% even though Newmont also suffered from a bad fourth quarter; -$1B losses at Newmont in 4Q2011 brining total profit for the year down to $366m).  Also to consider; Agnico-Eagle Mines took on a $644.9m writedown on its Meadowbank mine in the 4Q giving the company a net loss of $601.4m in the 4Q.  The mine plan had to be changed because of its 'high cost nature'.
Also, annual dividend was up 10% to record high 11 cents a share (though none was paid in the problematic 4th quarter).     The company was valued at $19B as recently as May 2011 which is almost 60% more than it is today.  That brings its market value per ounce of reserve to a near industry low $130/oz (compare that to Goldcorp's $618/oz at, $708/oz at Yamana Gold).  Cash flow from operating activities +40.3% to $1.8093b on the year, convinced yet?  Then consider the possible takeover offers.  European Goldfields which isn't even producing yet and has only a fraction as much gold as Kinross, recently got $2.5B from Eldorado Gold.  Kinross has low cash costs, lucrative projects (Cerro Casale) and a growing revenue stream and that makes it a lot more valuable in a M&A scenario.  CAPEX was +163% to $1.6515.
Don't forget that Kinross's current market cap of about $12B is about the same as it was before it acquired $7B Red Back Mining.

Eldorado Gold (nyse: EGO) - Coming off a record year for gold production (+4% to 658,652 oz), revenue (+33% to $1.042b) and even profit (eps +41.5% to 58c) while dividends more than doubled from 5c a share to 11c. Operating cash flow was also strong, up 40%. AND unlike the other major gold producers total cash costs only went up marginally ($382 --> $405). The European Goldfields acquisition will make it the biggest gold producer in Europe by 2015 (1.5m ounces a year) which couldn't come at a better time; European demand for gold is stronger than ever as is the price of gold.

New Gold (tsx: NGD) - In June 2012 its fourth operating mine will open.  That will push company production over 400,000 ounces for the first time.  Goldcorp's El Morrow (New Gold's interest is 30%) will reach full production in 2018 which should give the company an additional 150,000 ounces annually.

Newmont Mining - Gold reserves grew 9% in 2011 to 99M ounces a third of which is in Nevada, 17% in Africa.  Reserves were 93.5M one year earlier and 91.8M oz December 2009.  Biggest source of attraction at Newmont right now are the dividends, 4Q2011 quarterly dividend up 133% to 0.35 a share.

Also of interest:
-On March 1, 2012 Newcrest Mining, Australia's largest pureplay gold company began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange.  It will be the 4th largest mining company with a listing in Toronto.
-USA has 3rd highest corporate tax rate in the world.

AuRico Gold Intermediate Producer after wise acquisitions (Northgate Minerals, production, silver, 2012, exploration)

   Update for 4Q 2011 As reported on January 13, 2012 Aurico produced 72,119 ounces of pure gold (up from 29,384 in 2010) and 1.109 million ounces of silver (down from 1.2 million qoq), or 92,815 oz of gold equivalent (up from 53,030 qoq) during the three months ended Dec 31, 2011. Consolidated cash costs for the quarter were 67.1% higher to $680/oz due mainly to non Mexican operations in Australia acquired through the Northgate takeover (only produced 29,858 oz in the 2011 year but at a cash cost of $863/oz). North American operations finished the year at a cash cost of $499/oz (over 80% of production is still only coming from Mexico, Canadian projects won't start producing until 2012 at the earliest). Over the 12 months Aurico produced 187,401 oz of gold (up 64.3% from 114,064 oz) and 4.728 million ounces of silver (down 4.6% from 4.954 million yoy). The largest producing mine, Ocampo saw higher cash costs in the last quarter owing to lower grades being mined, while El Cubo's higher costs (up to $1,046 on the year) were due to a major conversion in its method of mining which may be part of the deal struck with workers in 2011 to raise standards at the mine, ending the shutdown. Ocampo still had relatively low production costs during the year ($413/oz in the 1st half, $436/oz in the third quarter). For the year Ocampo, which accounted for 72% of gold equivalent production had a cash cost of $415/oz (realized), down 5.0% (though it was $553/oz in the last quarter which could be an aberration considering Ocampo's cash costs have been inconsistent quarter to quarter throughout 2011 due to higher/lower grades being mined).

Stawell, AUS mine life ends in the second quarter of 2012 which you probably already realized considering 2011 4Q production between it and Fosterville was only 29,858 oz at a cash cost of $858/oz (2009 production there was 206,500 ounces, cash cost under $500/oz). Young-Davidson mine in Canada is 79% complete. Young Davidson will produce 180,000 ounces of gold a year for 15 years at a long term cash cost of $400/oz. El Cubo which was shutdown in 2010 had cash costs of $1,090 in the 4Q and $1,046 during the year BUT you have to remember that almost all of what El Cubo produces is silver (556,379 ounces in the quarter up 3.7% compared to only 8,670 ounces of gold).

Update for 3Q 2011 As reported by AuRico Gold on November 10, 2011 the company produced 45,686 gold ounces (up from 27,018) and 1.4 million silver ounces (up from 1.19m oz), or 76,630 oz of gold equivalent (up 68%) during the three months ended September 2011; All of the increases in production came from mines in Mexico meaning that the higher revenue and profit are not the result of the Northgate Minerals acquisition (Northgate's main properties are outside Mexico). Even though cash costs were up 9% to $487/oz margins were 55% higher ($1,217/oz) due to record breaking gold prices ($1,704/oz), that resulted in a 580% increase in profit (to $62.6M or 36c a share). The El Chanate mine became the first Mexican operation to record one million man hours of work without lost time injuries. Not all was rosy however, all of the production increases came from El Chanate and El Cubo two mines that produced neither gold nor silver in 2010, in 2011 they combined to produce 20,842 oz of gold (16,444 from El Chanate) and 308,528 oz of silver (all at El Cubo) while the company's main mine Ocampo showed negative production growth (-8% for gold production/-15.3% for gold sold and -10.5% for silver production/-20.4% for silver sold). Cash costs remained low at Ocampo ($436/oz) and high at El Cubo ($936/oz but down from 1,386/oz). Average realized gold price was $1,704/oz up 38.54% (from $1,230/oz), realized silver price was $38.13/oz nearly double what is was the year before ($19.19/oz). Higher production particularly from the smallest mine, El Cubo (gold equivalent ounces up to 11,360 oz from nil) propelled 2011 annual guidance up to a high of 195,000 oz from 189,000 oz. Range for silver is 4.95-5.0m ounces (up from 4.84-5.56). Cash costs for the year are on track to be $445-$475/oz. By comparison, in the first half of 2011 cash costs were $486/oz (even with Ocampo being $413/oz which is $23/oz lower than what it was in the 3Q).

   AuRico acquired Northgate Minerals on August 29, 2011 for US$1.49 billion which represents a whopping 46% premium to Northgate's average stock price in the previous 20 days, but a record low of 14.7 times EBITDA based on Northgate's earnings before tax, depreciation, ammortization in the previous 12 months, the lowest in a North American deal since 2004 when Goldcorp bought Wheaton (by comparison, Kinross Gold paid about 40 times more than EBITDA for Redback Mining). Ironically, Goldcorp is also the company that paid one of the highest premiums in a takeover, 56% higher than the average stock price for Andean
Resources in the 20 days leading up to the deal. (Bloomberg: Northgate Takeover Proving Cheapest) At a time when the price of gold is on the rise AuRico is being bold, making deals that most companies wouldn't think possible (AuRico made US$1.9 billion in takeovers since April 2011, that's 87% greater than AuRico's market value in 2010). (MorningstarAdvisers: Digging for Outliers in Gold Mining) Included in the deal is the $370 million Young-Davidson Mine in Ontario which could begin producing as early as late 2012 (3 million ounces/15 year mine life, Young-Davidson also has 1.5 billion pounds of copper). Also of note, Northgate's assets are scheduled to produce 75% more in 2013 than in 2011 compared to 40% for AuRico. AuRico also gains a foothold outside of Mexico for the first time. Ocampo, the company's biggest producing mine also produces silver at a rate of between 4 and 5 million ounces, annually. The two biggest operating mines, Ocampo and El Cubo each have their own ore processing mills with a capacity in excess of five thousand tonnes per day (combined). In the last quarter ended June 2011 the company's operating cash flow increased 247% and its 2011 pure gold production guidance increased to between 175 and 195,000 ounces, gold equivalent (includes silver) rising to 265-295,000 ounces (about 33% of total production comes from silver). (2011 2nd qtr report)

For AuRico, production costs are low (for the six months ended June 2011 it was $413/oz (2.4% lower) at its largest mine Ocampo which produces at a rate of just over 110,000 ounces annually, overall it was around $486/oz). Total production (after takeover of Northgate Minerals is complete) is comparable to Eldorado Gold, New Gold and Osisko mining, three companies that have a market value 2 to 3 times higher. Even after 2 deals in 5 months that boosted its size by more than 70% AuRico continues to be totally unhedged meaning that it is fully exposed to changes in the price of gold, not a bad position to be in at a time when gold investment is spiking (even debt laden nations like Greece are buying up the commodity, others like Thailand, Mexico, Russia, South Korea are increasing reserves).

The only downside of the deal is that it led to the break up of Northgate's takeover attempt of Primero Mining which would have given it another 3 million ounces of proven gold reserves at San Dimas, Mexico.

Big Exploration Companies Only An Investment Away From Becoming Major Industry Players

&nbsp&nbsp It seems weird when a company with more resources of a particular commodity isn't valued higher by the stock market (compare, for example Seabridge Gold or Northgate Minerals to Detour Gold; Cenovus Energy (oil) to Anadarko Petroleum). When companies aren't producing (such as the case with many big exploration companies) people are more skeptical of their estimates, especially if they don't have the financing in place to turn projects into operations; Ivanhoe Mines suffered from that for years before Rio Tinto confirmed the company's standing by calling Oyu Tolgoi 'the biggest copper resource in the world'. Examples of companies that have gotten away with lieing about resources include Greywolf Resources, a group of companies in Argentina which the president claimed in 2004, lied about reserves, even Shell has been caught but that was at a time when regulations industry-wide, were softer. Furthermore, energy consumption experienced the biggest yearly increase since 1973 in 2010, in 2010 it was up 5.6% largely due to China (up 11.2% surpassing the USA) and non-OECD nations (63% higher than 2000 levels). (World energy consumption up 5.6% in 2010, biggest rise since 1973: BP) Brazil, for example was on pace to import 50% more gasoline in 2011 than in 2010 (3.2M barrels Jan-Aug compared to 3.2M barrels Jan-Dec accounting for 5% of domestic fuel needs). In 2010 90% of cars sold in Brazil run on a combination of bio-fuel and gasoline but bio-fuel is getting more expensive: Sugar cane price is up 85% over the last year. (Brazil boom takes world fuel markets by surprise)


Here are three companies that I think would benefit from more investment and media exposure.

Meg Energy - Recoverable oil resource is close to 6 billion barrels. That's almost as much as Canada's biggest petroleum companies Suncor (7-8 billion, with a market value of over US$50 billion), and Canadian Natural Resources (over 6 billion, MV is over US$40 billion). Being heavy oil doesn't really make a difference anymore as synthetic oil is easier to produce and more widely used than it used to be (though oil prices need to be at least $50/bbl for it to be economically viable to produce but I don't think that level will be breached anytime soon). Phase 2B of the Christina Lake project has costs totaling $1.4 billion (about the same as MEG's total cash and cash equivalents) that will be spent in 2011. The biggest phase of the project (will increase production by 250,000 barrels per day or 7X more than what phase 2B will produce) is the third phase. You can imagine the price tag there, receiving regulatory approval shouldn't be a problem but more investment will probably be needed. The company recently reached $10 billion in market value and China's third biggest oil company has already invested in it so attracting more shouldn't be difficult, but when it's announced, individual investors could show a lot more interest. Update: In October 2011 JP Morgan, the world's #1 bank in terms of revenue, forecast oil at $121/barrel by 2013, at the same time it expects oil prodction that year to rise by about 2M bbls/d to 91 million barrels a day.
By 2045 oil sands will produce close to 11M bbls/d and that will continue for a century. Between 2012 and 2020 oil output from the tar sands will double (1.7 mbpd --> 3.4 mbpd) and triple in the next 25 years to 5.1 million barrels per day. Tar sands crude is over five times more expensive to extract than middle east oil however with oil prices up more than 400% since 2001 and Alberta continuing to charge one of the lowest royalty rates in the world (fell from $3 to $2/bbl between 2001 and 2009) there is much profit to be made.

Bankers Petroleum - Has interest in Europe's largest onshore oil field (7.5 billion barrels in place). 2P reserves are over 268 million barrels and rising fast (proved reserves up 30% in 2010), including stakes held

Performance of Gold Mining Stocks not Necessarily Correlated with the Price of Gold (last 2 months gold price is up over 14% but a basket of large/mid cap gold stocks is down 7%)

Gold stocks have decreased in value by about 7% over the last 2 months even though the price of gold has risen 14%. (Maison Placements Canada Inc.) Goldcorp and Kinross Gold both fell 4% in July 2011 even though the price of gold increased 14% (in Canada the S&P gold index only increased 8% during that time even though it hit a near term low prior to that). (globeandmail: Gold stocks still lag surging bullion price) Gold companies are playing catchup for a number reasons; Many of the established companies have dwindling reserves (annual production exceeds reserve replacement) which is one of the reasons behind declining global output (China is one of only a handful of countries that can be relied on for growth); Prior to the more recent spike in the price of gold (before 2009) gold production worldwide fell each year, from 2005 to 2009 consecutively meaning that record high gold prices are needed just to keep production steady (higher gold prices make new mine production easier to accomplish because cash costs don't need to be low for healthy margins to be realized) (Goldsheet - Historical World Gold Production) Over the long term, production has also been down in the established mining districts of South Africa and Canada. (Gold News:Gold Mining Decline) In September 2010 all of the world's gold stocks had a combined market value of US$ 360 billion, that compares to US$ 19 billion in 2000 (increase is due mostly to new mining companies entering the market; higher gold prices make even the highest cash cost operations economically viable).

There is optimism regarding production though. In Australia, Olympic Dam (BHP Billiton's trillion dollar gold/copper/silver project), Super Pit, Newcrest Mining's Cadia Hill (33 million oz of gold reserves) are well on their way to producing in the near future while in other countries that have exhibited falling production rates in the 2000's (Canada specifically), new projects at Detour Lake, Malartic, Kerr-Sulphurets Mitchell and Snowfield/Bruceback (88 exploration projects in British Columbia alone in 2010 with capex spending the sixth highest since 1991) have investors optimistic. (Mineweb: Officials believe one of the largest gold resources in the world lies within BC) Canada's biggest gold project, Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell (reserves at 39 million ounces for gold and 214 million ounces for silver) is estimated to have cash costs of only $105 for the first seven years, that's four times less than Goldcorp's cash cost which has the lowest among tier 1 gold companies; also four times lower than Yamana Gold's cash costs !

The reason for the 7% drop in gold stocks at a time when gold prices increased by double digits (%) is simple: Companies with declining reserves are looking to mine in high cash cost regions out of desperation (higher cash cost=smaller margins=market value of each ounce goes down). Newmont Mining is an example; though reserves have maintained growth the increases have been smaller [only about 1.6% growth in 2P reserves in 2010, 93.5 million from 92 million ounces versus 7 million between 2008 and 2009 (85 mil in 2008/92 mil in 2009], established companies like AngloGold and Goldfields have decreasing production rates while other companies like Kinross Gold have taken on lots of debt to make questionable acquisitions (by issuing paper, other examples are Barrick Gold's acquisition of Equinox Minerals). Smaller potential for cash cost improvements/production rates by established companies means the junior, relatively new players (like Eldorado Gold, Detour Gold, Osisko Mining) and others like Yamana Gold (undervalued because of past risks which have proven to be not a problem for the company, Yamana was up 13% in the month of July, being one of the only major gold players to record significant growth over that time (Newmont was flat while Barrick Gold was only 3.5% higher, Goldcorp and Kinross were flat) is where the highest growth rates (PEG Ratio, P/E ratio) will come from. In 2008 though, things were different; For most of 2008 when gold prices started their overall upward trend, it was the large cap companies that outperformed the small cap; the opposite was true in the summer of 2011 when gold prices broke through new levels, the change in behavior might simply be the result of a much higher support level for gold prices making high production costs less of an issue for startup companies (many more juniors entered the market in 2011 than in 2008). Goldcorp's largest gold producing mine Red Lake, is nearing the end of its mine life (about 700,000 ounces/year gone), but Goldcorp production will be maintained due to many other mines commencing (Penasquito, Mexico reached commercial production in late 2010; Pueblo Viejo, Dominican Republic; Cerro Del Negro, Argentina).

Another thing to consider is that there are some factors unrelated to stocks, which affect spot prices; For example in early August of 2011 (when there was a lot of economic uncertainty) gold and silver spot prices declined at the same time major stock indices fell by their largest margin since the 2008 recession, the commodities selloff was sparked by a margin call (temporary selloff due to traders being required to meet call options). On August 8, 2011 when stocks performed poorly, gold spiked again (gold is the first thing central banks/banks/investors hoard when they want a stable investment medium, also when banks realize they might have to fulfill their significant short positions) but don't be concerned about the more gradual silver increase (historically, silver has lagged gold (time) when increases occur; the reason is that banks and large investors tend to wait until gold gets too expensive before buying the white metal); also, when gold becomes more costly, jewelers and industrials turn to alternatives and silver is one of them. Also consider the gold/silver ratio which is 44 (August 8, 2011), much higher than the historic ratio of under 20.

Some interesting facts about gold: 3/4 of all the gold ever extracted from the earth was mined after 1910. South Africa was the largest producer in most years since that time. Switzerland was the last country to tie its currency to the price of gold (1999). Until May 2009, all the gold ever extracted amounted to 5,835,876,025.6 ounces or about 85% of an ounce per person (165,446 tonnes). Gold weighs 19.3 times as much as water, is even more rare than diamonds, never oxidizes (maintains its shine), and in its more natural form, is one of the softest metals. Web Directories

Yamana Gold : Unjust Criticism Causes Investors To Overlook A Fundamentally Sound Company (undervalued, production, projects, 2012)

In 2010 Yamana produced 10.0 million ounces of silver (silverinstitute.org) and 1.05 million ounces of gold (Yamana Gold corporate responsibility:2010) making it a top 15 gold and top 19 silver producer that year (rank among all companies including those diversified). The gold churned out was produced at a total cash cost of $442/oz (fiscal 2010) 32.4% less than the cash costs industrywide in the third quarter and substantially lower than key competitor AngloGold Ashanti ($638/oz). In the last quarter of 2010 (one of its record quarters for production) Yamana produced 286,682 ounces of gold at a cash cost of negative US$34/oz giving it a solid margin and earnings optimism. Yamana's free cash flow (operating cash flow less capex) was $31.1 million in 2010 nothing to brag about but a far cry from thet 259.4 million in losses recorded two years earlier. Mineweb.com March 4, 2011:Are gold cash costs per ounce headed for extinction?
Update: On Jan 11, 2012 Yamana reported 2011 fiscal year gold production at 1.1 million ounces (up 5%) led by El Penon at 476,000 oz and Gualcamayo at 159,000 oz (up 18%). What's so great about this news is that the company last told us that it would produce only 900,000 ounces, that's 18% less than it actually did! Chapada produced 135,000 oz gold (same as the year before) and 166 million pounds of copper (up 11%) while Jacobina showed no growth in production (122,000 ounces). After by product credits, cash costs were $50/oz (gold equivalent which means silver is also included) significantly lower than the $250/oz estimate. The company plans on increasing gold production by 43% by 2013 to the range of 1.5 and 1.7 million ounces reaching 1.75 million ounces by 2014. 2012 gold production is estimated to be 1.3m ounces.

On June 25, 2011 the value placed on its gold per ounce by the market (Enterprise Value/Gold Equivalent) was $324.3. That compares to $404.67/oz for Goldcorp (60 mil oz AU, 30 mil oz AUequiv (silver)) and $495.36/oz for Eldorado Gold (15.41 million ounces) making Yamana's gold relatively undervalued (which is meaningful considering Yamana's cash costs per ounce are about the same).

Company earnings have been steady since 2009 however stock performance has been underwhelming. The reason? the company has relied on production from areas considered risky due to their currency situation (Brazil), inflation (Argentina) and natural disasters (earthquakes in Chile); Gaining the confidence of investors hasn't been easy given the losses incurred by other companies exposed to similar risk (coal mines in Australia). Not helping the situation is the fact that production (specifically gold) is expected to be flat until at least 2012 when a slew of new mines begin operating (Mercedes ~1.0 million gold equivalent ounces, Pilar - 1.4 million ounces of gold, Jeronimo - 0.928 million ounces of gold, Santa Luz - 1.2 million ounces gold), The good news: the new mines, home to more than half of the company's 2P gold reserves will come on tap at about the same time and immediately raise annual production by as much as 80% while possibly lowering total costs of production (most are at or under $460/oz).

Update December 28, 2011 Company will pay a dividend worth five cents a share, on January 13, 2012. Yamana's dividend has increased steadily since 2009. December 28th is the ex-dividend date meaning anyone who buys the stock after that time will not be entitled to the January 13 dividend.