Showing posts with label petroleum industry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label petroleum industry. Show all posts

Sunday, January 31, 2016

The Canadian Petro Dollar & Alberta Petroleum Industry Oil Price

The first month of 2016 turned out to be quite harsh for the Canadian dollar and those who use it, giving even more meaning to its pseudonym "the loonie".
Unlike the US Dollar which is riding high at the expense of nearly every other currency, the rate given for the Canadian (and Russia) version dipped to just under 68 cents breaking 25+ year lows (early 1990's was the last time the currency was anywhere close to current levels).

petro dollar, canadian dollar, oil price, chart, oil companies, costco canada, same store sales, petroleum industry, gas price,
You might ask: why is there such a strong correlation between the loonie and the oil price ?  and why doesn't the US dollar share that relationship to oil all things considered. 

ExxonMobil XOM, Chevron Corporation CVX are two of America's largest companies; oil companies represent 6% of the nasdaq 500; 3 of the 5 highest yieilding s&p 500 stocks are oil companies; United States oil production now ranks second behind Saudi Arabia.

look no futher than gdp vs the petroleum industry

Canada may produce less oil than the United States but its economy is nine times smaller and that makes it more dependent on the commodity (7% of gdp directly - tens of billions of dollars in capital expenditures by big oil which for the last five years fueled all of the growth in the only job-creating provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan).  Also note that the USA only recently started exporting oil abroad - Canada exports nearly all of its oil to the United States thanks to a lack of oil refineries out west (Canada's biggest refinery is on the east coast and there are currently no pipelines going west to east).
Another thing to consider is the quality of oil that Canada produces.  Canadian oil is more like tar - it requires heavy processing before it can even be used by refineries.  This adds costs to usage and makes it less attractive to potential buyers.

What was the perfect set of conditions stateside turned out to be the perfect storm for Canadians


While Americans were being spoiled with 10 cents per litre gas price, Canadians faced rapid inflation thanks to their dependancy on the US for food ($8 cauliflower was commonplace).


Costco Conquers Canada


According to the most recent results out of Costco Canada, same store sales are up by a record 9% twice what it is stateside and triple that reported by Canadian grocery leaders Loblaw Companies and Sobeys.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

What CNOOC (CEO) Nexen (NXY) Acquisition Means For Oil Sands (China oil companies production reserves offshore)

After months of waiting for the Canadian government to approve it, on December 8, 2012 China's national offshore oil corporation (nyse:ceo) completed a $15.1 billion all cash takeover of Canada's tenth largest oil company Nexen (tsx:nxy).  The deal is the largest foreign investment by any Chinese company ever and will undoubtedly be a confidence booster to Chinese firms looking to buy companies abroad after having been spurned by Unocal Corp in 2005 ($18.5 billion offer rejected) .  In order to get the Canadian government to approve the deal, CNOOC had to make a few concessions:  It agreed to an annual review of its operations, that Nexen Canadian operations employ more Canadian workers than Chinese, CNOOC has also said that it will consider listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange.  The stipulations are not new, the Canadian government has a similar arrangement with Rio Tinto Alcan.

Don't be fooled !  Chinese investment in Nexen doesn't necessarily indicate their interest in the oil sands.  Nexen only accounts for about 6% of oil sands production (including shale, Nexen produces 52 thousand bpd in Canada), in fact the majority of Nexen's production comes from outside of Canada in regions such as the North Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and offshore West Africa (African production down from 18th boe/d last quarter to nothing this quarter). 

Monday, October 22, 2012

Up and Coming Natural Gas Companies Progress Energy (PRQ) Tourmaline Oil Corp (tse:TOU) Paramount Resources (POU) Intermediate


                  Over the last two years these rapidly growing companies (five billion dollar Tourmaline Oil Corp is only 4 years old !) weathered the steep decline in natural gas prices, which is quite impressive to say the least;  2012 first half revenues at Tourmaline (+32% --> $204 million), Paramount Resources (-6.2% --> $101 million) and Progress Energy (-12% --> $103 million) all stable despite the huge drop in natural gas price realized: Tourmaline -46.2% Paramount -43.2% Progress -33.5%.  What's more, these companies were able to attract the investment (Progress received $1.1 billion from Petronas) necessary to maintain capex spending (-3% Paramount, -22% Tourmaline) at a time when Canada's biggest player, Encana divested $2.2 billion in assets and lowered its 2011 investment plan by -37%. 

Yes, the federal government's ruling against the takeover of Progress Energy by Petronas complicates things for investors;  for many intermediate gas producers cash flow lags capital, making outside cash (investment) essential for asset development to continue, but I wouldn't be too concerned.  Cash flow will experience a natural rise over the coming quarters because natural gas prices are on the way up !  +73% in just the last six months. 

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Meg Energy Oil Exploration Update (double production to 65,000 by 2013, 260,000 b/d in 2020, Surmont 2018, phase 3)

    Meg Energy is one of Canada's largest oil exploration companies that owns 100% of a 3.7 billion barrel, 80 block section of Christina Lake, one of Canada's largest oil megaprojects (development began in 2008). In the first nine months of 2011 the company produced 25,450 bbls/d up 33.4% from 19,071 b/d in the corresponding period of 2010, but only 20,945 in 3q11 due to maintenance activity (versus 19,339 b/d in 3q10, all production comes from Christina Lake). Production and revenue recorded record highs in the second quarter of 2011, at 27,826 b/d and $279m respectively. Production is forecast to reach 29-31,000 b/d by the end of 2011 attributable to new equipment being installed at Christina Lakes' second phase expansion (when construction work there is completed in 2013 (operating at 100% compared to less than 30% currently) operations there will bring in an additional 35,000 b/d, more than doubling current production possibly to as high as 65,000 b/d). C$500 million of the C$1.4 billion in total project costs needed by phase 2B has already been spent with the balance coming in 2012. The company has only been producing since the last quarter of 2009 when output was 2,427 b/d.

MEG Energy has $937 million to spend next year on growth projects (which represents 70% of its $1.37B 2012 capex) the majority of which has already been allocated to phase 2B with the rest ($1-200m) going to the 3rd phase (initial construction), the exact amount to be determined pending a key regulatory decision in 1H2012 (3rd phase is key since it will add 150,000 b/d). There's also Surmont that should be coming online close to 2018 (Surmont has vast resources of heavy oil but very little of it represents upgraded reserves). MEG capital expenditure was $243.218 million in the July-September period (2011) compared to only $96.561m in 3q 2010. Maintenance costs and more money going to growth projects increased long term debt which is now at $1.792b up from 1.005b in 3q10. The last phase isn't expected to be completed until 2015-2020 and so the maximum 260,000 b/d estimate probably won't be reached until the latter part of that period.

The steam required to melt bitumen so that it can be brought to the surface by the process known as steam assisted gravity drainage, is produced at a power plant that doubles as a cogeneration plant which allows the company to turn excess steam into power able to be sold to the Alberta Power Grid (the extra money helps reduce operating costs ----> which increases operating netback). Western Canadian Select price is lower than WTI because it is a mixture of heavier oils/bitumen and synthetic oil and thus produces fewer barrels of oil per metric ton (prior to processing). Production costs per barrel were down significantly in the nine month period to $16.38 from $22.81 due to higher production volumes and Christina Lake producing at a normal phase (not ramp up phase as in 2010). Revenue from extra power sold to Alberta power grid (cogeneration plants) reduced net operating costs down to $11.95 from $18.63/bbl. In the 3rd quarter Meg received enough compensation from sold power to pay down per barrel operating costs by $5.13 ($4.43/b in the nine month period), that's up significantly from $2.13/bbl in the 3q10 ($4.18 in 9m10).

According to the company, its 1.9 billion barrels of 2P reserves are worth $12.1B, there's also another 1.8 billion barrels of inferred resource worth $7.0b (the company's market cap is under $9B). Christina Lake covers a large area, Cenovus Energy and ConocoPhillips already operate a large scale, synthetic oil project there that produces under 30,000 b/d that's also undergoing expansion (they tap into the McMurray Formation). The project is within the well known Athabasca Oil Sands of central-east Alberta.

Approximately 20% of Alberta's oil sands are close enough to the surface to be recovered by open pit mining, the rest requires vairous in-situ technologies. Alberta's royalty rates on oil production have fallen from an avg of $3/bbl to $2/bbl over the last decade and that has made it an even more attractive place to produce. Oil sands can be over five times more expensive to produce than conventional however with oil prices up more than 400% since 2001 that barrier to investment is becoming less of an issue (if the price of oil remains at or over $60/bbl which makes oil sands production economically viable, Alberta's oil production could reach as high as 11M bbls/d by 2045). Reason that heavy oil commands a lower price on the open market than WTI? You need 1.7 barrels per metric ton more of the <10 degree API heavy oil versus lighter oil because its high specific gravity (density as compared to a reference) makes its API gravity lower leading to fewer barrels produced according to this calculation. In the first nine months of 2011 the price of WTI oil was up 23.0% to $95.48/bbl from $77.65/bbl ($89.76 in the 3q11).